صراع الشكاك : نيتشه و البيرونية

Abstract EN

With a direct and good stroke, we can reconcile the history of philosophy with the history of skepticism.

Assuming that the philosophical position is originally a skeptical position that has functioned to form a problem concerning the answers to the great cosmic and human problems.

The first philosophical question, formulated by some of the sages of ancient Greece, was asked in the context of doubts about the religious responses inherited and familiar at the time.

And if all thought is skepticism, the skepticism can be moderate systematic doubt, and it can be radical or excessive sectarian doubt.

In the history of philosophical thought, we can note two notable skeptical moments; The skepticism of phyronism in the third century BC.

AD and Nietzschean skepticism at the end of the 19th century.

Both are a stormy doubt which eclipses all the certainties attached to philosophy and to all the fields in circulation.

Thus, within the framework of the study of the reading of Greek philosophy by Nietzsche, a strong comparison emerged between the doubt of the phyronists and that of Nietzsche.

Through the following proposition: How did Nietzsche take advantage of the Greek skeptics? Is there any doubt in their doubt? How to represent the details of the scene of the struggle of these skeptics?