بناء المسائل الأصولية على إجماع الصحابة رضي الله عنهم في مباحث الألفاظ

Abstract EN

One of the pillars of fundamentalist inference: the consensus of the Sahaba, may God rest his soul on fundamentalist issues, was taken from their legitimate view, their jurisprudence and their ijtihad actions, and the origin of this: due to the fact that the origins of jurisprudence: the evidence of the total sharia, and the origin of the total evidence are two guides: the Book, the Sunnah, And whatever else belongs to them, they came with a clear Arabic tongue, and the companions, May God bless them, revealed a tongue, and postponed them a statement, and explained them in a speech, they were Arof tongues, so they dispensed with their knowledge of the issue about its meanings, although god bless them they lived the revelation, They considered the hierarchy of the building of judgments according to their reasons; Those who are among the issues of the semantics of words by the consensus of the Sahaba, may Allah be pleased with them, including: the origin carried the general public in general and does not carry on the least plural, and the general after allocation is an argument, and the judgment received by my companions goes beyond others, and the general indication of its members is categorical at the edges, and that the least plural Three, that what has been proven against him is proved against his nation, that the group is involved in one's speech, and the commons tale of the narrator prevails, and that the frequent public may be allocated to the news of Sundays, by analogy, and the continuous work of the Sahaba is allocated to the public.