موقف ابن تيمية من الصفات الإلهية عند ابن رشد

Abstract EN

In this study, we seek to identify an issue that was of great interest on the part of Islamic scholars, jurists and scholars, and philosophers, which are divine attributes, we have focused our words on the positions of ibn Rushd and ibn Taymiyyah, and our talk aout the divine attributes between these two characters necessarily leads us to talk about Ashari and Mutazil by virtue of the fact that the issue of adjectives formed the essence of the science of speech in verbal teams; we tried to explain ibn Rushd's position on Ashari on; after we explained that the Ash'ari tended to prove attributes contrary to the position of the.

then we focused on the main topic of study, which is the divine attributes of ibn Rushd and the criticisms that ibn Taymiyyah addressed to him, where ibn Rushd saw that god has specific attributes which are seven: science, life, ability, will, hearing, and speech.

however, ibn Taymiyya was critical of ibn Rushd’s position on these attributes, stressing that ibn Rushd’s understanding of the Qur’an and Sunnah is wrong, and this is what made him mistake in understanding the divine attributes.

Mu'tazilites, which tended to deny them in response to the stereoscopic.