خصوصية المعاملة الجزائية لمدمني المخدرات : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

This study dealt with the criminal treatment of drug addicts in the laws of Egypt, France, and Saudi Arabia, through several axes, namely the privacy of addiction, the privacy of criminal penalties prescribed for addicts, the placement of treatment as an alternative to instituting criminal proceedings, and Access to addiction and mental health services as an alternative to the execution of punishment.

The study concluded that the addict is sick.

And sinful; However, treating him as a precautionary measure has priority over punishment.

The study also concluded that laws under study are dominated by the therapeutic nature of the addict, the most of which is French law.

However, most of judicial principles are with punitive trend for the addict.

At the end of the study, we recommended in the necessity of access to addiction and mental health services for any person who has been proven with addiction, and stating on impediment to prosecute the case for the addict who does not adhere to the provisions of access to addiction and mental health services or treatment in, and this shall be removed as soon as the addicted access to addiction and mental health services upon his request for treatment.

We also recommended that Public Prosecution will recover its authority to file a criminal case against him if he does not adhere to what is imposed on him.

Also, we also recommended in allowing the extension of the deposit period possible if it is necessary, and finally it was recommended in stating that the cancellation of the deposit is made permissible for the court not obligatory, if the applicant breaches the duties and instructions of treatment.