حجية المحررات الإلكترونية في الإثبات و موقف النظام السعودي منها

Abstract EN

Through this research, we reviewed some aspects related to the authoritativeness of electronic documents in proof compared to the Saudi system through various inductive, analytical, deductive and comparative research methods.

The electronic document, and its parties, then after that we talked about the conditions for considering electronic documents as an argument in proof, which is that the electronic document should be readable, its data should be sound, and the electronic document should be protected from penetration.

For evidence through the systems of electronic transactions and commercial courts.

We concluded the following: Electronic documents are a set of data and information that are exchanged and sent between its parties.

It is possible to differentiate between the electronic document and the traditional or paper one through three matters, namely writing, support, and signature.

The characteristics of the electronic editor are speed in contracting, effectiveness, confidentiality and security, accuracy, perfection and clarity.

The electronic editor has three parties: the sender or originator, the recipient or addressee, and the mediator.

Electronic papers have two types: formal electronic papers and customary electronic papers.

The Saudi system recognized the authenticity of electronic documents and considered them an argument and evidence of proof through the electronic transactions system and the commercial court system.

As well as in most countries of the world to keep pace with the tremendous development in all aspects of life, especially financial and commercial transactions.