الدلالة بين القديم و الحديث

Abstract EN

The research tackles the most significant issues of linguistic significance, including its linguistic definition and how the researchers of the other branches of knowledge tackle it, the types of significance in the past according to each researcher and scholar until our lifetime to get to know the efforts of our Hadith scholars who drew different types of significances out of the heritage of the predecessors, so they created it at its best.

I do not trace all of it but to clarify it in the reader's mind, so that he cannot get involved in a vast deep ocean of the applied semantic lesson of the types of the other significances which I believed to be an applied lesson of the texts of the study basically, marginally, suggestively, and sentimentally.

Thus, I had not to attempt to apply these four significances unless I caused the reader to know the other significances in the past and the present by an unapplied theoretical foreword of the texts of the study.

I do not claim that I knew it well because it requires extensive researches; however, brevity is the soul of wit.

Therefore, it is clear that significance is the soul of the linguistic research in totality, but why not? I saw that each linguistic branch does not flourish but with its contribution, in addition to the other sciences such as fundamentals, logic, and the like which alternate it to bridge the gap in it with no excess.