تحقيق القول في ما نسبه السيوطي في الأشباه و النظائر إلى سيبويه من المنقول

Abstract EN

Heritage is of great importance, so we had to study it in order to see its precious components, explain its ambiguous phrases, and criticize the delusions that may be attached to it without stabbing or offending, for this I wondered: Did the late grammarians accurately convey what the ancients said, so that the researcher could rely on their statements? So I chose the book of al-Shabat wa al-Naza'ir al-Suyuti (d.

911 AH) as a model and looked at what was attributed to Sibawayh (d.

180 AH) to make sure whether it was accurately transmitted or whether there is a difference between what Sibawayh said and what al-Suyuti attributed to him, and in order to reach scientific results I followed the comparative approach required by the nature of The article concluded: - Non-Suyuti, in many places, is the term Sebwayh, and he may preserve the meaning and may violate it.

- In some places, the sayings of Sharrah al-Kitab were attributed to Sebawayh.

- He attributed a witness to Sebawayh, and in fact it is one of the evidence in the book.

- flip the measurement in two positions; So he made the original branch at Sibawayh, and made the branch with him as an asset.

- Change the name of a witness from the evidence in the book.

These results make us not trust what the later grammarians have reported from the first ones except by referring to the books of origins.).