المناظرات بين الإباضية و المعتزلة ببلاد المغرب الإسلامي حتى نهاية القرن 05 ه 11 م من خلال المصادر الإباضية

Abstract EN

The Islamic Maghreb countries, together with the Islamic Congregation of the Islamic Conquest, have known many delegations of doctrinal and Islamic jurisprudence.

Their concepts differed in the understanding of religion.

This led to a wide debate among these currents, which transcended the boundaries of peaceful dialogue, sometimes to intellectual intolerance, others to material conflict, especially when politicians were victorious over an opinion on the expense of the other for the continuation of their authority and influence.

In historic literatures books of public history and biographies have recorded many forms of this conflict, whether peaceful or material, which finally settled the form of jurisprudence and the Islamic Maghreb.

The focus of this article is put on the peaceful intellectual conflict between the Ibadi and the Mu’tazilah through their successive debates until the 5th of Hidjri / 11th of Miladi, because this was a means of effectiveness in responding to the violators and establishing the doctrine in the hearts of his followers.

The intellectual conflict was very great among the different sects and teams.

After having been provided with an important asset of inheritance, Its elites aimed to resolve the doctrinal issues by seeking rational and critical arguments through education and indoctrination, debate, writing or responding, especially with the emergence of the cycle of Lazaba at the beginning of the fifth century Hijri, which provided an educational and scientific atmosphere through which the Ibadi school was firmly established in the Islamic Maghreb, which was credited to its founder Mohammed bin Bakr al-Farsaiti, who conversed the remnants of the Mu'tazil in the Maghreb "Bani Musab" Ibadi.