التبيان في تفسير غريب القرآن للسيد محمد علي الشهرستاني - ت 1344هـ - في ضوء النقد التحقيقي و اللغوي ظ

Abstract AR

On one of the dark days in Iraq, Prof.

Dr.

Hikmat Obaid Al-Khafaji called me, approximately in 2005 or 2006 AD; So he said to me, in his prayer: (I want to see you soon in the holy Karbala), so I accepted his request for any reasonAfter he settled in his residence in his famous house, he told me his meeting with Professor Dr.

Hussein Ali Mahfouz in his house in Baghdad, and at that time Dr.

Mahfouz (may God have mercy on him) was talking about the manuscripts he had, including the manuscript (Al-Tibyan fi Tafsir Gharib Al-Quran) by Sayyid Al-Shahristani, and he said: - And the reporter, Dr.

Al-Khafaj - (This manuscript needs a proven investigator, for the features that are.

.

.

).

So Dr.

Al-Khafaji explained the subject of the investigation, explaining to Dr.

Mahfouz that Alia Al-Araji is one of those involved in the investigation, and he is what he wanted Al-Minbari for this investigation to be.

After that, I received the images from Dr.

Al-Khafaji, and began my work on realizing this valuable book.

I refuted the manuscript, and began to work, but my acceptance of the doctorate prevented the completion of the investigation, and one of the disadvantages of people is that the manuscript was presented for investigation at the doctoral stage, but it was rejected on the pretext that it was a single copy! ! ! It is worth mentioning that I met Mr.

Ali al-Shahristani, who resides in the holy city of Mashhad, at the Al-Ghadeer International Conference, which is held by the Holy Shrine.

I told him about it; He said to me: (We, the Shahristani family, have this book in manuscript, but the papers are scattered, and we can hardly distinguish the paper and its aftermath).

This is what Dr.

Al-Mohaqiq Al-Shati mentioned in the newspaper (S), the sixth lineWhatever the case, the concerns kept me away from the valuable manuscript, but my work on it is from time to time.

And in Karbala, Al-Hussain Ala, I saw in the Library of Quranic Sciences, which is between the two holy mosques, this book, a well-documented book.

It does not reflect what the late Mahfouz wished, nor did Shahrastani, who was compiled with it, want it to appear or close to that.

Completely distorted it, and hardly fall to the benefit of research, and investigation.