السيادة و الدولة : دراسة في المفهوم و العلاقة

Abstract EN

Sovereignty has sometimes served to justify certain imperial undertakings and the colonization of many territories by the world powers.

yet it is still in the name of sovereignty that the national liberation movements their struggles to ensure full independence for their respective have led political communities.

this situation did not fail to challenge researchers in international relations.

it refers in fact to the debates relating to changes in the international system by the transformation of its structural principles, in particular the principle of sovereignty, which seems to be particularly challenged by of international administration of territories.

recent experiences state sovereignty would be to the law what state power would be to the fact, and sovereignty would be understood as a right to law when the power designated the state of the state.

this is the meaning of the distinction of state sovereignty and power outlined in these pages.

analyzing the impact of globalization on state sovereignty begs the obvious question.

why have many states in this world pursued globalization despite the risk of loss of sovereignty it entails? is it because the impact of globalization on sovereignty and territorial integrity - the two essential attributes of the modern Westphalia "nationstate"- is enormously exaggerated? if this is the case (as some might think), then this would confirm the writings and the predictions about "the end of the nation state".

is it possible for states to accept the loss of? their sovereignty because it is no longer valued as much as in the past.