نظرات مقارنة في المتداخلات الأصولية و أثر ذلك في اختلاف الأصوليين

Abstract EN

In this paper, I have dealt with the overlap between a number of fundamentalist issues, in which there is an overlap in their significations, but after examination it turns out that the delusional interference is not true, however, I aim to achiev the accurate representation of fundamentalist issues, and examines the range to which fundamentalist issues are studying each of these overlapping.

Moreove, one of the most striking results is that it is not valid to prove the interference by releasing or denying it, There are cases where the issue claimed happened, on the other hand, all the implications of these overlapping placements are moral effects that were influenced by a number of fundamentalist issues.