المفطرات من الصوم : دراسة مقارنة بين المذاهب الأربعة

Abstract EN

This study is interested in shedding light on the things that violate the fast of Ramadhan according to the four schools of jurisprudence.

The study aims to address issues such as what arises from ignorance of the things that break the fast, which on occasions, lead to accusing others of being impious and lenient with fasting, which is the second pillar of religion.

Clarifying this issue is an urgent matter due to the dynamics of our time and the mixing of doctrines within one country.

This research investigates the differences between the four schools in matters related to what violates fasting.

By doing this, the study aims to arrive at and clarify a preference that can settle these differences.

I will use the recent medical development to back up my findings.

This medical knowledge was not available to jurists at the time of issuing most of these laws and Fatwas.

The key differences were related to issues such as if the things have reached the abdomen or not.

These issues can be easily addressed and identified by science today.

The study used preference based on following the evidence or taking precautions in matters of religion because it is a followed principle.