البعد الديني في فلسفة الابيقوريين الطبيعية و الخلقية

Abstract EN

The research presented in its previous context in the discussion some of the most important points on which the foundations of this research were based on exposure to atheism in a detailed way by definition because the definition is the basis on which we understand the true meaning of the meaning of atheism so that we can understand the meaning that the two schools were accused of in terms of being a meaning A religious reversal as it is rumored about it or a meaning other than a religious one.

Therefore, the definition of atheism referred two interpretations of it that would validate one of them without the other, which is religious interpretation and moral interpretation Where most dictionaries knew that atheism is the tendency of all what is known, and thus there are two meanings that can be assigned to them the meaning of atheism in which the two schools were accusedthe first meaning which is the religious meaning, which has been completely excluded according to the information and intellectual opinions previously provided by the two schools and their thinkers that would To remove all accusations of religious atheism, but the other meaning, which is the social meaning, that is, the social atheism, from what is common and contradicts the teachings and foundations of the society that exists in the school, therefore most of the suspicions and even certainty that the atheism that has been accused of the two school is social concerning ethics and ideas The social, political and natural far from religious atheism, but the charge of religious atheism was a charge that would lead to a society alienated from school so Altzmha some of the great philosophers and thinkers who were against them, and rejecting the thought of these school completely.