نفي الإتهام : بين الصمت و الكلام

Abstract EN

The defendants often deny the accusation attributed to them through denial by presenting a set of defenses that refute the evidence of the accusation leveled by the prosecution.

The legislator has entrusted the power of accusation to the prosecution alone after it is based on a set of presumptions or evidence of his perpetration of the crime, and it remains for the accused against him to deny the accusation attributed to him by making defenses or denying the evidence of the accusation by denial or confession, with the accused maintaining the presumption of innocence and the accusation He does not deny this presumption, and therefore it is sufficient for the accused not to present any evidence that proves his innocence as it is authentic in him and he enjoys it when he enters the hearing room, and thus his silence is sufficient for him, which may not be interpreted as evidence of the crime or that he committed it, which leads us to clarify the issue of denying the accusation by observing silence Or deny it by speaking with different defenses.