اختلاف أحكام التجويد عند القراء العشرة

Abstract EN

The ten frequent recitations between them differ in many general rules and principles, and many brush words, and this is followed by the difference in a number of rules of intonation and its rules.

This research deals with the differences in the rules of intonation among the ten reciters, and aims to show the amount of difference in the provisions of intonation in the ten readings, and collects the points of contention in the intonation resulting from the different readings and their approximation to the researchers.

The first: the importance of the science of intonation and the ruling on the difference in its rulings, and the second: the difference in the rulings of intonation among the ten reciters in the chapters on the principles of readings, and the third: the differences in the rules of intonation among the ten reciters in the fursh of letters, then a conclusion, and an index of sources and references Among its most important results: that the readings were not divine in source; Reading the Qur’an is an obligatory matter because it was also revealed, and that the science of intonation is closely related to the science of readings, and they both take care of how the Qur’anic words are pronounced, and that the readings are more comprehensive than intonation, as many of the sections of intonation and its issues are within the sections of the readings, and that the different readings result in different provisions of intonation.

In many places, it is based on disagreement in the readings themselves.