أثر استراتيجيات علم النفس الإيجابي في تنمية بعض مهارات الذكاء الاجتماعي لدى طلاب معاهد الفنون الجميلة

Abstract EN

The current research is important because it deals with the concept of social intelligence and aims to identify the effect of positive psychology strategies on developing some social intelligence skills among students of fine arts institutes by verifying the following hypotheses: -1- There are no significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the experimental group scores before and after the program.2- There are no significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the scores of the experimental group and the control group in the post-test.3- There are no significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the scores of the experimental group in the post and adjunctive tests.

In order to achieve the objectives of this research, two tools were applied, namely the (Abdul Razzaq, 2015) scale of social intelligence, and the experimental program prepared according to the strategies of positive psychology that the researcher prepared.

The experimental approach was adopted to verify the hypotheses of the current research, as the research sample consisted of (30) students who obtained the lowest score on the scale of social intelligence, and they were selected from the Institute of Fine Arts for Boys in the city center of Baquba / Diyala Governorate, and the sample was distributed lntentionally between two equal groups.

The prepared program was used to apply it to the experimental group, while the control group was not exposed to the counseling program.

The researcher adopted the positive psychology strategies method and the number of sessions (15 sessions) was presented to a group of experts in this field, and they supported the validity of the program and to process the research data.

Adoption of several statistical methods (Pearson Correlation Coefficient, Kolmkorff - Samir Nouf selection, Wilcoxen test).

The current research has reached the following results: -1- The presence of significant differences at a significant level of (0.05) in the experimental group and in favor of the program.2- The presence of significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the experimental and control groups in the post-test in favor of the experimental group.3- There are no significant differences at the level of significance (0.05) between the scores of the experimental group in the post-test and the adjunct.