تعليقات القراء على مواقع التواصل الاجتماعي للصحف المصرية حول أزمة حي الشيخ جراح

Abstract EN

The research aimed to monitor and analyze readers’ comments on news articles on the crisis of the Sheikh Jarrah neighborhood in Palestine, by analyzing the comments on the pages of three Egyptian newspapers on Facebook: Al-Masry Al-Youm - representing the private newspapers -, Al-Ahram - representing the national newspapers, and Al-Wafd - representing the national newspapers.

partisan newspapers.

The importance of the study stems from the fact that the public domain theory is concerned with providing discussion spaces for conversations and discussions on the topics raised, as well as the fact that each individual has the right to express his opinion on an equal basis, whether this field is material or moral through what the Internet has achieved from social networking platforms that allow conducting Free discussions.

According to the objectives of the study, the research tools were identified in the following: The study newspapers: which were represented in the Facebook pages of the following newspapers: Al-Masry Al-Youm, Al-Ahram and Al-Wafd, while the time period for the study was from May 8, 2021 AD to May 21, 2021 AD.

Content analysis form: by analyzing user comments during the study period and obtaining quantitative data from which conclusions can be drawn about the issues raised.

Analysis of frames of reference: by analyzing users' comments and accessing the framework adopted by the user in writing his comment on the topic at hand to write comments on it.

Analysis of Evidence Paths: To reach the paths of proof, whether logical or emotional, included in the users' comments during the study period.

Analysis of the actors: to identify the actors mentioned by the users.

The study also adopted the survey and comparison methodologies with the aim of conducting a survey of users' comments and making a comparison between the comments that were written on the pages of the three newspapers on Facebook.

The study reached a set of results, the most important of which is that the most comments on the subject of the study were on the page of Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper, and the least comment was on the Al-Wafd newspaper page.

The pages of Al-Masry Al-Youm and Al-Ahram newspapers, while the vernacular topped the comments of users in Al-Wafd newspaper.

User comments on the three pages of the study were also concerned with discussing the news published on Facebook, as this appeared in the position category of the thesis, while the neutrality category was the lowest category in the comments of Al-Masry Al-Youm and Al-Ahram newspapers, while the opposition category was the least positioned category of the news article on the newspaper page delegation.

As for the active forces, the active forces have varied between individuals, groups, organizations, parties and states, Egypt has repeatedly emerged as the highest active force, and the Palestinian people have emerged as the highest active force in the users’ comments on the Al-Ahram newspaper page, and President Abdel-Fattah Al-Sisi has emerged as the highest effective force in the comments on Al-Wafd newspaper page.

As for the frames of reference, the political framework scored the highest frequency during the study period on the three study newspapers, while the lowest was a category without a frame of reference for the three newspapers.

The results of the study also showed the importance of applying the public domain theory in its hypothetical sense through the Internet in general and through social networks in particular.

The results of the study showed the important role played by social networks in providing the arena for discussion mentioned by Habermas in the hypotheses of his theory.