Exegeting Sura al-Fatiha for the Masses : Bediuzzaman Said Nursi and Haji Muhammad Sa'Id bin ‘Umar

Abstract EN

Purpose: This article considers exegetical perspectives on the best known Sura of the Qur'an from two exegetes who lived in diverse contexts in the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century Caliph- ate.

Bediuzzaman Said Nursi is arguably the most influential theologian to emerge from in Ottoman Turkey in its long history.

Haji Muhammad Sa‘id bin ‘Umar, by contrast, enjoys a local reputation as a scholar in the Malay-Indonesian region but is unknown outside of that area.

Methodology: This research is based on a comparative analysis of the exegesis of both scholars on Sura al-Fatiha, exploring the techniques they used to reach ordinary Muslims with their exegesis, not just highly educated Muslims.

Findings: Said Nursi and Muhammad Said bin ‘Umar came from quite different backgrounds and contexts.

Moreover, their exegetical styles were fundamentally different, with the former's being more thematic and the latter's being more literalist.

Nevertheless, each succeeded in producing exe- gesis that reached the masses, thereby meeting their overall goals of reinforcing the commitment to faith and dynamic spirit of Muslims in their respective contexts.

Originality: This research is original in various ways.

First, comparative studies of Said Nursi and Malay-language exegetes are few in number.

Second, the identification of similarities in the results of studies on exegesis despite the use of different methods requires greater scholarly attention.

This article should stimulate interest in further studies on the matter(1).