نقد المتن بين تأصيل المتقدمين و تقعيد المعاصرين : دراسة حديثية نقدية لقاعدة ذكرها المعلمي اليماني (ت1386 ه)‎ في مقدمة تحقيقه لكتاب" الفوائد المجموعة للشوكاني " تتعلق بنكارة المتن

Abstract EN

Criticizing the Text in between the Rooting of the Predecessors and the Implementation of the Contemporaries: A Critical Hadith Study
Of the Rule stated by Al- Muallami Al-Yamani (died in 1386 A.

H.

) in his Introduction to his Authentication of the Book “The Collective Benefits of Al- Shawkani”; Regarding the Denial of the Text
 
By: Sami Mohamed Youssef Ismail
Department of Osoul Al- Deen
Faculty of Islamic and Arabic Studies for Men in Cairo
Azhar University

t
This research deals with a rule stated by Al-Muallami Al-Yamani regarding the criticism of the text.

The research examines the rule originated by Sheikh Al-Muallami Al-Yamani to see to what extent it is valid and compatible with the rules verified by the Imams of Hadith and the preceding critics.

In addition, the research sheds light on the relationship between the criticism of the chain of transmission and that of the text as well as the critical approach followed by the scholars of Hadith.

Moreover, the scholars of Hadith had relied on precise principles and rules in their criticism of the text and the chain of transmission.

The research follows the inductive- analytical approach.

By the end of the research, the researcher has highlighted the most outstanding findings.

For instance, it is necessary to consider the theoretical and practical aspects of the Imams while studying any rule.

Another finding is that many examples which Al- Mualami Al-Yamani (may Allah have mercy on him) stated do not agree with what he mentioned as a rule.

Speaking about the purposes of the Hadith by quoting only without conducting any applied study, has more disadvantages for the researchers and scholars than its advantages.

In addition, the scholars of Hadith were interested in criticizing the text, they had their disciplines and rules not as some claimed that they were concerned only with criticizing the chain of transmission and neglected the text.

Finally, there is no correlation between the authenticity of the transmission and that of the text since the transmission may be accredited whereas the text is not or vice versa.