الشك و الظن و اليقين في القرآن الكريم : دراسة أسلوبية

Abstract EN

The article (conjecture) in the qur’anic speech still obstructs thought, insists on the mind, and requires reconsideration of its evidence in the qur’anic context, as there are sensitive issues attached to it that cannot be explored, and their mysteries are resolved only by an accurate understanding of the text, and a discovery of the relationships that link between its parts, and what this understanding issues from documenting the communication links between the texts and their recipients.

as linguistic units rise from the text, liberated from the values of the lexicon and the stability of meaning, except by the original extent and the significance embedded in its linguistic material, so it opens up to the text, releasing its semantic potential, and revealing the mysteries of its messages.

since the Arabic lexicon is one of the constants of the researcher’s tools and the starting point for study and analysis, many scholars and commentators have read what the dictionaries have deposited in their middles regarding the subject (conjecture), Ibn Faris said : “al-Za’ and al-noun are authentic, indicating two different meanings.” and in Lisan al-Arab: “(think) the hermetic : conjecture is doubt and certainty, except that it is not certainty, but it is the certainty of contemplation.

as for the certainty of the bystander, only knowledge is valid in it.

Lisan al-Arab, Ibn Manzur, Muhammad Bin Makram Bin Manzour : 2762, Dar al-Maaref edition, verified by Abdullah Ali al-Kabeer, Muhammad Ahmad Hassab Allah, Hashem Muhammad Al Shazly.

dictionary of language standards, Abu al-Hussein Ahmed Bin Faris Bin Zakaria, verified and controlled by Abdul Salam Muhammad Haroun : 3 / 462, Dar al-Fikr for printing, publishing and distribution.

this close connection between the materials : doubt, suspicion and certainty has become the starting point of the study that seeks to clarify the distinctive significance of each of them and upon which the qur’anic text is based, as reason, logic, visual and audio taste.

refuse to create a reciprocal relationship between words, each of which has its own meaning and what interferes with it in its space.

the semantic of what is close to the words, and the corresponding ones.

what distinguishes the qur’anic speech on several levels, such as the phonemic, rhythmic, morphological, syntactic, rhetorical, semantic, and the level of use and rotation, proved the impossibility of replacing a word to another, and leads to the negation of the link between these three signs : doubt, suspicion and certainty, which make them sometimes a single sign.

and since the basis of the study is language in context, in search of second meanings, and a reading of the ambiguities of semantics, stylistics were taken as a way to research the expressive capabilities of linguistic phenomena, as a statement of the characteristics of the language according to which the news speech turns into its impactful function, through the study of the associative relationships between the signifiers, and what they produce.

signs that deny the totality of synonyms or antonyms, as well as taking care of the accompanying rhetorical meanings, and phenomena such as text binaries, repetition, singular and plural, definition and masculinity, and so on.

considering stylistics as one of the branches of modern linguistics, it is concerned with studying methods or linguistic choices, to highlight the effectiveness of the stylistic approach in studying the qur’anic speech, as the study starts from a set of judgments and interpretations issued about the text, then re-analyzes it stylistically.