الأساس الفلسفي لتكافؤ الأدلة

Abstract EN

Praise be to Allaah, and peace and blessings upon the last of all Prophets.

The research in the process of inference on the possibility of knowledge of the facts of things is regarded one of the pillars of research in the field of philosophical studies, and stating the defects in the cognitive inference process on the possibility of knowledge of the facts of things is part of the significant research tasks, and from that is the claim of commensurability of proofs, which is hitherto yet to be studied.

So, I traced its skeptical philosophical basis with research and study regarding the possibility of the knowledge of the facts of things.

The research reached certain findings, the most important of which are: The skeptical philosophical basis for the commensurability of proofs for the possibility of the knowledge of the facts of things is still traceable in modern philosophy, and it has produced a number of philosophies such as existentialism, utilitarianism, pragmatism, and others that attempt to destroy the possession of the fact; because each individual has the right to determine what they opine to be the fact, on condition that it will benefit them in return, and this is deemed as undermining of the facts of things, and it contradicts the rational universal primary principles.