دلالة المفهوم بين الطرح الأصولي و علماء اللسان المحدثين : مقاربة لسانية مقارنة

Abstract EN

Research on semantics is one of the most important issues in jurisprudence that has been distinguished by accuracy and recourse methodology.

Many studies jurisprudence scholars and linguists tackled this issue.

In addition to the foundational importance of these significances in deriving legislative rulings from their legal evidence, as deriving and extrapolating of these legislative rulings from texts goes through several ways.

The first is selecting the conditions of words in relation to meanings and connotations, and then the nature of the verbal exchange of those meanings, and finally the methods of deduction semantics.

To understand the rulings from texts, it is not possible to isolate the science of jurisprudence from the linguistics, for the rules of jurisprudence are not the same as the rules of grammar by which we understand the apparent meaning of the utterance, but rather the methods to understand the connotations of the legislation and its concepts.

As well as inference from what linguists have dealt with for the significance of words on their uttered or implied meanings, whether in terms of the text (Content of the discourse), and if the scholars of the rhetoric have referred to by the meaning and the meaning of the meaning.

In this paper we will deal with the definition of the concept for the scholars of jurisprudence, trying to illuminate the concept in the modern linguistic approaches.