الاستثناء من النكرات و أثره على العموم : دراسة أصولية مقارنة

Abstract EN

The research paper is about an important linguistic issue, which is the issue of exception of indefinite articles from the general rules.

As the fundamentalists have a difference of opinion on the issue of plural of indefinite article, whether it is beneficial to the general rules or not? The reference point for the disagreement is whether this issue exception of indefinite articles from the general rules is acceptable to linguists or not? And the point of disagreement is the settled indefinite article.

The scholars differed on that issue on four points, and the reason of disagreement on the issue is the difference in the definition of exception.

Is this expulsion of what must be included or what could be included? The research has been organized in an introduction, then preface, four sections and a conclusion, in which the most important results of the research and its recommendations are included.

The fourth view is the one to which Ibn Al-Sarraj has an inclination, and that is permissibility of exception from indefinite articles when it is described or specified.

Those who say exception from indefinite articles is absolutely prohibited, it is possible to compel their statement on whether there is no benefit from the exception.

Some of those who have argued that the indefinite pluralism benefits the general ruling inferred from the permissibility of exception of the indefinite articles because the exception is the norm of the whole.