المقدس التأريخي وأثره في تصدع الظاهرة النقدية للاستشراق: مقاربات في كتابات النقد الإسلامية

Abstract EN

At a time when orientalist criticism insisted on questioning the Islamic heritage with its sharp and skeptical tone to its stable intuitions in consciousness and memory, the Islamic responses continued to reveal a structural and systemic defect in its arguments of argument that it often falls in the historical facts given by granting him the status of the sacred, which represents the ultimate truth, even if it is far what about that! these responses seemed frail to the point of incoherence in front of the orientalist opinion, which sweeps this data at one time by questioning its credibility and its representation of the existing reality.

his choice does not give him freedom of opinion to reject what he sees as incompatible with reason and the historical approach, and even the sanctity of the Prophet as if he were living in a state of conflict and collision of sanctities, so he sees resort to rumination, interpretation, selection, empty emotion and idle enthusiasm and thus cracks the argument response.

this is what the research tries to draw attention to as an important task in criticizing criticism, and to point out alternative intellectual choices for meanings regarding the topics raised.