استجواب الخصوم في الدعاوى المدنية : دراسة مقارنة

Other Title(s)

Interrogating litigants in civil cases : a comparative study

Dissertant

المجالي، تقى عبد الرحيم نوران

Thesis advisor

النوايسة، باسل محمود حسين

University

Mutah University

Faculty

Faculty of Law

Department

Department of Private Law

University Country

Jordan

Degree

Master

Degree Date

2020

English Abstract

Interrogation is considered as one of the evidential procedures that the court may take based on its own initiative or at the request of one of the litigants in order to obtain the litigant's acknowledgment of the incident in question; it enables the judge to seek the truth related to proving the incident and facilitates the settlement of the case.

Interrogation is concerned about the events of the case during the procedures related to the case disposition; it is recognized after the court confirms its importance away from wasting time.

In this vein, the importance of the interrogation emerges as one of the most important topics in civil proof, where it could be applied at any stage of the case and is directed against the litigant or his/ her legal representative.

Interrogation has several implications, including that if the interrogated litigant acknowledged, the acknowledgement provisions are applied to him, while if the litigant denied, no implications are applied to him.

Several legislations, including the Egyptian legislator and the Lebanese legislator, have organized interrogation within their laws and put in place a special legal system for it, in which the legislations demonstrated the provisions of the interrogation and the procedures to be followed as well as the effects of that.

In spite of that, the Jordanian legislator organized interrogation in one context within the law of civil trials; however, it had shortcomings.

Through this study, I researched the topic of interrogation in detail in terms of comparing it with other Arab legislations, examining its types, conditions and purpose, distinguishing it from other means of evidence and clarifying its provisions, procedures and implications, where the study addressed the shortcomings the in Jordanian legislation.

We hope that the legislator would consider the results and recommendations that we reached in this study.

Main Subjects

Law

No. of Pages

78

Table of Contents

• APA
• MLA
• AMA

Language

Arabic

Data Type

Arab Theses

Record ID

BIM-1380593