الأحاديث الموضوعة و دورها السياسي في الدولتين الأموية و العباسية : دراسة تحليلية

Abstract EN

to addresses an important issue that arose early in the history of the Islamic Arab State.

As soon as the era of the Rashidun Caliphate ended with the death of the caliphate Amir-Almuminin Ali bin Abi Talib (40H), and the death of the first successors of the Umayyad Caliphate (60H), the conflict over the allegiance to the caliphate position and the transition from the prevailing regime to allegiance to the mandate of the Covenant began to take the characteristic aspect of that period.

This conflict initially took the illusory form of direct military confrontation with the princes locally then with caliphate at the end.

By the failure of this aspect to make a tangible change in practice, later it took the form of counter-propaganda, the situation arose as the form of forged-fabricated traditions attributed to the Prophet Muhammad (G.p.o.h) since it was a form of rejection against the existing political system.

This research highlights the examples of such narratives that have become widespread during this period, and shows the correlation between the Interpretation by Transmission accounts and those defendants of their forged-fabricated traditions, or who contributed to their promotion intentionally or unintentionally.

Each individual party to this conflict has utilized of all circumstances and has acquired of all available elements to achieve its interests.