حالات الحكم بالإبعاد القضائي في التشريع الإماراتي : دراسة مقارنة

Other Title(s)

Cases of judicial deportation in the UAE legislation : a comparative study

Joint Authors

العاني، محمد شلال حبيب
النوايسة، عبد الله نواف
الخيلي، جمعة محمد

Source

مجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم القانونية

Issue

Vol. 19, Issue 1 (31 Mar. 2022), pp.310-350, 41 p.

Publisher

University of Sharjah

Publication Date

2022-03-31

Country of Publication

United Arab Emirates

No. of Pages

41

Main Subjects

Law

Abstract EN

It became clear from the study of the issue of judicial deportation cases that it is a subject of legal importance in the field of the Federal Penal Code and the special criminal legislation in the United Arab Emirates, as it is a severe criminal penalty for a foreign person who is convicted of committing a specific crime on the territory of the UAE country in which he resides.

Accordingly, the subject of judicial deportation arises when the foreign person who commits one of the crimes stipulated in all UAE criminal laws.

Actually, it is the UAE judiciary that has determined and evaluated the gravity of the criminal risk involved in the ruling on deportation.

The federal legislator distinguished between two types of judicial deportation, namely: mandatory judicial deportation and permissible judicial deportation.

In the first case, the Emirati legislator identified a number of cases of ruling on the arrangement of deportation and obligated the court to order the deportation of the foreigner who was sentenced to a freedom-restricting verdict in all crimes.

These include crimes on display, crimes affecting state security, the crime of strike, crimes against religious beliefs and rituals.

To this are added some other cases mentioned in special penal legislation stipulated by many laws, such as the law on entry and residence of aliens, the law against narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, along with the criminal law against combating the financing of terrorism and human trafficking and the law for juvenile offenders and the homeless.

As for passport expulsion, the court may choose or not choose, upon conviction of a foreigner, a penalty restricting freedom between his or her expulsion, after verifying the extent of the criminal danger to society.

We have dealt with judicial expulsion to the extent that responds to the theoretical study and extrapolation of comparative jurisprudence opinions supporting and opposing deportation.

We supported this study with judicial applications from the rulings of comparative and Emirati courts and other evidence as well as comparative legal and jurisprudential applications.

We conclude from this study that judicial deportation is a criminal measure that restricts negative freedom in the legislation of the UAE criminal legislation, and how criminal risk is a prerequisite for the ruling deportation according to Emirati Legislator.

We therefore request the latter to intervene to determine the period of deportation of the foreigner, in accordance with the type of crime he has committed and its threat to society.

American Psychological Association (APA)

الخيلي، جمعة محمد والعاني، محمد شلال حبيب والنوايسة، عبد الله نواف. 2022. حالات الحكم بالإبعاد القضائي في التشريع الإماراتي : دراسة مقارنة. مجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم القانونية،مج. 19، ع. 1، ص ص. 310-350.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1384380

Modern Language Association (MLA)

الخيلي، جمعة محمد....[و آخرون]. حالات الحكم بالإبعاد القضائي في التشريع الإماراتي : دراسة مقارنة. مجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم القانونية مج. 19، ع. 1 (آذار 2022)، ص ص. 310-350.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1384380

American Medical Association (AMA)

الخيلي، جمعة محمد والعاني، محمد شلال حبيب والنوايسة، عبد الله نواف. حالات الحكم بالإبعاد القضائي في التشريع الإماراتي : دراسة مقارنة. مجلة جامعة الشارقة للعلوم القانونية. 2022. مج. 19، ع. 1، ص ص. 310-350.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1384380

Data Type

Journal Articles

Language

Arabic

Notes

يتضمن هوامش.

Record ID

BIM-1384380