التاريخ و المعرفة التاريخية و موقف المؤرحين من العلوم المساعدة : ابن خلدون نموذجا

Abstract EN

The science of history and the field of historical knowledge and the perception of historians towards them (Ibn Khaldoun as model).

Since the first half of the twentieth century, the science of history has raised cognitive issues related to historical fields of knowledge, as the production of the historical text became dependent on interdisciplinary sciences, or what is known as "auxiliary sciences.

" Without them, the historian cannot abide by the objective and scientific conditions in producing the historical text.

This proposition in writing the historical text is not a product of the past two centuries, but rather it is an old proposition in a new attire.

Whereby the scholar Ibn Khaldun, in his introduction and before him, Al-Masoudi shed light on the disadvantages and shortcomings of the historical notation or the production of the historical text by ancient historians, Wherein Al-Masoudi questioned many things through his book - Meadows of Gold and Minerals of Essence - about the phenomenon of exaggerating, the hyperbole of numbers and the use of imagination that branded some historical writings.

As for the scholar Ibn Khaldun, the ancient historians failed to inform without insight and without a link between the present and its past, in addition he also recorder the weaknesses in the investigations of the truth or falsehood of the occurrence of the historical incident, and he also pointed that the nature of the relationship between the historian and the existing authority may have caused the historical truth to be lost.

As such, the writer of the historical text must be independent from the guidance and pressure of the existing authority so that the historical text does not remain static and imprinted by the method of transmission and reporting, and without scrutiny and enrichment by the interdisciplinary and auxiliary sciences, which can add and give sufficient credibility in writing the historical text.