اعتراضات النحويين على الدليل العقلي في كتاب (قواعد المطارحة)‎ لابن إياز البغدادي (ت681ه)‎

Abstract EN

This research deals with the objections to the reasonable evidence in the book (Qawaeid Almutaraha).

It states how it was dealt with by the author.

The book is of an educational nature with its simple structure and clear style, but at the same time it includes highlighting Arabic grammatical thinking, with what it mentions of division and branching, analysis and explanation, and mentioning of grammatical schools and their arguments and proofs, and objections to those arguments and giving answers to them.

Thus, the research aims at identifying one of these elements in Arabic syntactic though, namely, the objection to the reasonable evidence.

The grammatical objections to the rational evidence contained in the book varied.

Among these objections, the evidence is olutely invalidated, such as the objection by veto, and the objection by heart.

Including what invalidates the evidence in one place rather than another, such as the objection to the affirmative statement, the objection to the difference between the compared and contrasted by in terms of analogy, and the objection to the evidence's violation of the inferred school.

Including the objection to the rational evidence by something outside of it, such as the objection to the lack of influence, the objection to the inconsideration, and the objection to accompanying of the situation.

The research recommended conducting an in-depth study of the mental objection in the book.

As it is rich in these objections, in addition to the other aspects of grammatical thinking in which the book abounds.