معايير جودة أساليب الاستدلال العلمية في البحوث الإعلامية: دراسة في بحوث الصحافة ومحكميها إنموذجا

Abstract EN

This research discusses the problem of quality standards for scientific inference methods adopted by researchers in writing media research " Journalism research in particular", by analyzing the paragraphs related to the personality of the researcher when judging and discussing the information and setting a set of scientific criteria that show the quality of building the researcher's personality in writing the research and indicating the level of research Its quality and its arrangement from highest quality to lowest quality according to the opinion of arbitrators and discussants of scientific research, and follow the descriptive approach to describe the phenomenon.

It belongs to the type of survey research aimed at surveying the phenomenon in the style of samples and specifically random samples, as the research included a theoretical framework and the last two applications, the first of which included the analytical study to analyze a sample of the frame, and the other the field study, which included the design of a five-year scale to measure the quality of the performance indicators of research inference methods.

The results of the analytical section resulted in the methods of "emphasizing and "providing reasons for results" and acts of representation and reference, explanation, interpretation, comparison and preference, and actions of "opinion and observation" within the level of quality ranging from excellent to medium quality, and identified the performance indicators: "Analyzes and summarizes information", the performance index "analyzes, supports and develops", the index analyzes, interprets and adds, the index "analyzes and criticizes information" and the index "links the results to previous studies and professional and research experiences of the researcher" among the best tired indicators for the improvement and evaluation of the personality of the researcher.