التأصيل الفقهي لعقوبة السرقة من المال العام : دراسة فقهية مقارنة

Abstract EN

Summary This study aims to distinguish between the juristic rooting for the punishment for stealing from public money (a comparative jurisprudential study), through which it demonstrated the concept of public money, the importance of money in our lives, and the protection of Islam to this necessity, as well as focusing on the thief's punishment of public funds by explaining the origin of the dispute between The jurists, and the fruit of the dispute, showed the opinions of the jurists on this issue, the presentation and discussion of evidence, and access to the most correct opinion, and the study concluded that the thief's hand should be cut from public funds, and what was inferred by the owners of the saying that no cutting does not deliver from weakness, due to the weakness of the suspicion that they hold It and its corruption in this matter.