![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
ردود الزملكاني المتوفى 651 ه في كتابه "غاية المحصل في شرح المفصل" على الزمخشري و ابن الحاجب في قسم الأسماء : عرض و دراسة
Other Title(s)
Responses of Al-Zamlkani Died in 651 Hijri in his book " Ghayat Al muhassal fi sharh Al mofassal" to al-Zamakhshari and Abn-Al Hajeb in the names section : presentation and study
Author
Source
المجلة العربية للعلوم و نشر الأبحاث
Issue
Vol. 7, Issue 2 (30 Jun. 2021), pp.71-96, 26 p.
Publisher
Publication Date
2021-06-30
Country of Publication
Palestine (Gaza Strip)
No. of Pages
26
Main Subjects
Arabic language and Literature
Abstract EN
This research aimed to identify some of Al-Zamlkani's responses and evaluate them according to the experts of linguistics using the descriptive and analytical method.
This was achieved with a presentation of a brief translation of Al-Zamlkani; as the research centered on collecting the scholar's responses in his explanation in the nouns' chapters and his genres and grammatical aspects in more than one chapter.
This includes a response to an Absolute Had (limit) that needed a restriction, or certain expressions that confuse the scholar; thus, where incorrectly studied.
As for his response to Ibn al-Hajib in the chapter related to his personal perspectives presented in this explanation, he opposed him on the one aspect; while defended what Al-Zamakhshari mentioned about some of them in other chapters.
These issues were presented in two topics: The first was Al-Zamlkani's responses to Al-Zamakhshari and Ibn al-Hajib in the nouns' categories; while the second was Al-Zamlkani's responses to al-Zamakhshari and Ibn al-Hajib in the aspects of noun parsing.
The most important results demonstrated by the research were that Al-Zamlkani was seeking to facilitate the language and clarify the grammatical issues; as his responses varied when discussing Al-Zamakhshari; including a response to an Absolute Had that required restriction or expressions that confuse the scholar; thus, where incorrectly studied.
Al-Zamlkani also dealt with chapters of certain grammatical aspects; where his responses showed reliance on the logical aspect and philosophical thought at times and on his sheik and teacher Ibn al-Hajib’s belief at other times by quoting what was explicitly or implicitly mentioned.
The lack of interpretation and clarification in some of Al-Zamakhshari's phrases is a reason for the confusion that does not have a meaning for the scholars, including Al-Zamlkani.
American Psychological Association (APA)
آل ورقش، وضحى أحمد مسعد. 2021. ردود الزملكاني المتوفى 651 ه في كتابه "غاية المحصل في شرح المفصل" على الزمخشري و ابن الحاجب في قسم الأسماء : عرض و دراسة. المجلة العربية للعلوم و نشر الأبحاث،مج. 7، ع. 2، ص ص. 71-96.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1406434
Modern Language Association (MLA)
آل ورقش، وضحى أحمد مسعد. ردود الزملكاني المتوفى 651 ه في كتابه "غاية المحصل في شرح المفصل" على الزمخشري و ابن الحاجب في قسم الأسماء : عرض و دراسة. المجلة العربية للعلوم و نشر الأبحاث مج. 7، ع. 2 (حزيران 2021)، ص ص. 71-96.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1406434
American Medical Association (AMA)
آل ورقش، وضحى أحمد مسعد. ردود الزملكاني المتوفى 651 ه في كتابه "غاية المحصل في شرح المفصل" على الزمخشري و ابن الحاجب في قسم الأسماء : عرض و دراسة. المجلة العربية للعلوم و نشر الأبحاث. 2021. مج. 7، ع. 2، ص ص. 71-96.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1406434
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
يتضمن هوامش.
Record ID
BIM-1406434