الهوية الإسلامية في الفكر المعاصر

Abstract EN

The issue of identity is one of the problematic topics in philosophical thought and contemporary Islamic thought in particular, as much as modern Islamic thought thought about the demand for reform, and identity and its questions almost summarized the contradictions of Islamic thought, the increasing identity with the disintegration of thought, the symbols of identity in the Islamic community.

Islam, which embodied the Ottoman Sultanate and the birth of the modern independence state model in the Islamic world, whose concept of the modern nation replaced the traditional Islamic concept of the nation.

On the level of contemporary Islamic thought, the problematic of identity has taken on new dimensions that stem from the specificity of this thought.

Therefore, this study, through its use of the historical method, the structural method, the analytical method, and the comparative method, is an exploratory analytical attempt of contemporary Islamic thought in a comprehensive systematic identity context, as it proceeded to monitor and diagnose, and then Classifying Islamic philosophical thought into its multiple identities trends according to the dominant feature.

Those trends ranged from a traditional identity to a supranational identity, and a syncretic one, the supranational of which was the most effective and influential on the political level in the world of Islam.

The study concluded that contemporary Islamic thought did not consist of a single identity block, rather its answer to the question of identity branched into several visions based on several trends, sometimes divergent and conflicting to the point of fighting at other times, which may be true of the front school model of the study, which Emphasizes the need for a comprehensive Islamic identity, reconciled with the other, and taking into account national peculiarities.

It is determined according to the confrontation with the other, agreement or disagreement, and the type of this other in the first circle, where an individual is within a group and the other is internal, i.

e.

within the group, and the identity here is personal.

In the second circle, where a group is within a nation, the other is located here outside the geographical region, and the identity here is national or national, and according to this coordinator, the one who determines the type of level or circle is the other, not the ego.

In the national identity and national identity, patriotism or nationalism is the one who fills the field of ego looking at: Hatim Al-Werfalli, previous source, pp.

37-39Accordingly, the ego is a constant element and the other is the variable.

It seems that this approach is consistent with the theses of contemporary Western thought, which attempts to undermine the model of egocentrism in favor of the altruistic model.

It is worth noting that the first to distinguish between two levels of identity is the psychologist (Eric Erikson): the level of individual identity And the level of social identity, and he meant by the first the biography of the personal life of the individual, his gender, his name, his family and his clan, and this level of psychology is a developed model of the Freudian ego.

Therefore, the identity crisis in the psychological field is defined by the disorder that affects the individual in his life roles.

He doubts that he will be at the level that society wants him to be, quoting Catherine Halpern, a previous source from the Internet.

The American writer of Lebanese origin, John Joseph, adopted this distinction specifically for the levels of identity.

He argued that individual identity begins to reform psychology with the ego of the self or the feeling, but in the process it encounters social forces that work on the development of the superego: the unconscious, and that collective identities are a mixture of the ego and the ego.

The higher together and often or always, the ego has a desire to possess a unique, even if I am an ascetic cleric, which is supposed to transcend his humanity.

Who threatens his group see John Joseph language And identity is national, ethnic, religious, translated by Abdel Nour Kharaki, World of Knowledge series 342 Kuwait The National Council for Culture, Arts and Letters 2007 p.

50 and 51.

It can be inferred from the above that the extent of the overlap between the two levels of the main identity