![](/images/graphics-bg.png)
نقد المعيار الرائج في تصنيف التفاسير
Other Title(s)
Criticism of the common criterion for categorizing interpretations
Author
Source
Issue
Vol. 2021, Issue 42 (28 Feb. 2021), pp.143-176, 34 p.
Publisher
Publication Date
2021-02-28
Country of Publication
Iraq
No. of Pages
34
Main Subjects
Topics
Abstract EN
In this study, we dealt with the binary division of interpretation by opinion (praised and blamed), and we proved that interpretation by opinion is only one blameworthy section, and that ijtihad in understanding the Qur'an is not an interpretation by opinion, and we have criticized the documents that they claim from the attribution of saying distortion, as well as reliance on non-legal arguments, Relying on the esoteric interpretation and interpretation as well, and attributing all of this to the Shiite commentators.
We proved, with solid evidence, the innocence of Shiite scholars and their commentators from claiming that the Qur'an has been distorted, and we also proved the Shiite interpreters' reliance on scientific evidence in exegesis, the incorrectness of attributing the esoteric interpretation to them.
American Psychological Association (APA)
الغرباوي، طاهر. 2021. نقد المعيار الرائج في تصنيف التفاسير. المصباح،مج. 2021، ع. 42، ص ص. 143-176.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1417628
Modern Language Association (MLA)
الغرباوي، طاهر. نقد المعيار الرائج في تصنيف التفاسير. المصباح ع. 42 (شباط 2021)، ص ص. 143-176.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1417628
American Medical Association (AMA)
الغرباوي، طاهر. نقد المعيار الرائج في تصنيف التفاسير. المصباح. 2021. مج. 2021، ع. 42، ص ص. 143-176.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-1417628
Data Type
Journal Articles
Language
Arabic
Notes
-
Record ID
BIM-1417628