مسؤولية الحماية آلية جديدة لحماية حقوق الإنسان أثناء الأزمات الإنسانية : ليبيا و سوريا نموذجا

Abstract EN

The basic idea that revolves around the issue of humanitarian intervention is that despite its passing through many developments, it witnessed jurisprudential differences over defining its concept and legal problems because it contradicts the most basic principles on which international law is based, and failed to achieve the protection of human rights.

However, with the development of international relations, we find that international law has become prohibiting the state from mistreating its citizens.

there is no legal principle, even the principle of sovereignty itself, that can protect the crimes committed.

these considerations led to the use of a new concept known as the “responsibility to protect”, as an effective factor in responding to state violations of human rights.

the human.

the study concludes that the responsibility to protect is a synonym for sovereignty, not an opponent.

it stems from the idea that considers sovereignty as a responsibility, and protection is not a military issue in the first place, nor is it in essence a conflict between the sovereignty of the state and the sovereignty of the individual.

the responsibility to protect is based on three pillars.

the first pillar is the permanent responsibility of the state to protect its population, and to confront and stop flagrant violations of human rights.

while the second pillar is the commitment of the international community to help countries fulfill those commitments.

the third pillar includes the responsibility of member states.

in taking collective action in a timely and decisive manner through the security council and in accordance with the charter, in this case the principle of non-interference will be trounced in favor of the international responsibility to protect as a new approach for the international community to deal with humanitarian crises.