أحكام المعاهدات الدولية في القانون الدولي الجنائي و الفقه الإسلامي : دراسة مقارنة

Abstract EN

The paper deals with the provisions of international treaties in international criminal law and Islamic jurisprudence - a comparative study, and the objectives of the paper are to know the similarities and differences between the procedural and substantive provisions of international treaties in international criminal law and Islamic jurisprudence.

the problem of the paper is summarized in the main question: what are the provisions of international treaties in international criminal law and Islamic jurisprudence? what are the procedural and substantive provisions of international treaties in international criminal law? what are the procedural and objective provisions of international treaties in Islamic jurisprudence? the paper follows the comparative method.

and the descriptive-analytical approach, the paper reached a number of results, the most important of which are: the Islamic sharia does not include legal rules that specify the formal provisions that must be followed in international treaties.

the Islamic sharia, organized the objective provisions, a tight organization.