دلالة الاشتقاق على الأحكام الأصولية

Abstract EN

This research basically focuses upon the derivation and its relation to jurisprudence essential provisions ,it aims to demonstrate the durability of the relationship between the Arabic Language & Essentials of jurisprudence plus the interaction between them through the significance of derivation of highly important essentials like :General provision ,the contrasting concept , the truth , metaphor as well as its method regarding the derivation facilitating the regulations and provisions plus decoding it via the language ,as it was shown up in difficult expressions to understand in particular for the juniors .This research relied in its methodology on the inductive method, then the analytical and deductive method ,it consisted of four main topics: First topic: about derivation ,its concept and main pillars Second topic: about the impact of derivation in terms of the general provisions .Third topic: about the impact of derivation upon the truth and metaphor .

Fourth topic: about the impact of derivation upon the contrasting concept the most important results were as follows: The impact of derivation upon the general provisions had two parts: the verbal & Moral.

Regarding the derivatives in terms of their stability are divided into three parts :The flowing sources , the spontaneous sources and the past tense verbs , the most correct is that it might not be a requirement of keeping the meaning of derivation as the derivative is deemed to be real , and the contrasting concept for the derived is an evident allegation just in case the meaning of derivation has an impact in ruling .