بحث النظرية البنيوية من زاوية الحكمة المتعالية

Abstract EN

The structural theory is considered one of the common theories in social sciences.

This theory later expanded to encompass disciplines such as psychology, pedagogical sciences, economics and administration.

In our modern day, we have begun to observe the extension of this theory to the domain of natural sciences as well.

The first roots of this theory are traced back to the famous Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure.

By rejecting the independent meanings of all concepts, connotations and signifiers are analyzed and explained on the basis of the concept of connection and proportion.

Thus, connection and proportion enjoy authenticity in this theory.

The original question in this essay is the following: What is the criticism directed at the structural theory from the angle of transcendent theosophy? This question has been examined in this essay by employing the analytical/rational method.

On the basis of the data in the investigation, many problems have been attributed to the structuralism theory.

Among the most important of these problems are the following: a) rejection of an independent being despite the affirmation of connecting beings; b) rejection of the self and subjectivities of things; c) rejection of the freewill of humans; d) internal comprehensiveness of this theory; and e) the reductionist trend.