تنازع الاختصاص القضائي المدني بالسودان

Abstract EN

The study dealt with the conflict of civil jurisdiction in Sudan.

The problem of the study was that the legislator is keen to determine the jurisdiction of each judicial authority for the prope functioning of the judiciary, but it creates legal problems between the judicial authorities resulting from their conflict in determining the rules of jurisdiction to consider the case.

Judicial consideration of the case highlights the positive conflict.

The importance of the &udy stems from the fact that it is represented in filling a gap in the field of scientific research, as there are not enough studies, so this &udy is considered a conflict of jurisdiction.

It is represented in the importance of defining the jurisdiction because of its great role in facilitating the task for litigants and jurists in knowing the controls of judicial conflict, which will spare them suffering and save time for them.

The &udy aimed to identify the Sudanese legislator’s vision of cases of conflict of jurisdiction and the implementation of contradictory rulings in the civil judiciary.

A statement of the means created by the Sudanese legislator to prevent cases of conflict of jurisdiction.

Identifying cases of conflict of jurisdiction in the civil judiciary of Sudan.

To identify the extent of the Sudanese legislator’s ability to address the problems of conflict of jurisdiction in the civil judiciary.

The study followed the descriptive analytical method and the comparative method.

The study concluded that the Sudanese legislator gave the Supreme National Court the right to adjudicate on issues of conflict of jurisdiction.

The Sudanese legislator referred to two cases of conflict of jurisdiction: a positive one that creates between two parties, both of which have judicial jurisdiction, and a negative one if both of them relinquish jurisdiction.

The Sudanese legislator specified the procedures for the rcquesl in the case in which the dispute or abandonment occurred.

The Sudanese legislator has dealt with the problems of conflict of jurisdiction by defining its cases, the procedures for raising the requef and its impact, in addition to the procedures for examining and adjudicating the request