مستقبل اللاجئين الفلسطينيين و فلسطيني الشتات في قانون القومية اليهودية

Abstract EN

The study aimed to examine the Jewish national law and its impact on the right of return of refugees.

The researcher followed the descriptive-analytical approach, by searching in ancient and modern references.

The importance of the study is to shed light on the fact that this law, before its issuance, was paved with the speeches of Israel’s leaders.

Described in the research and the state of procrastination in the commitment to the agreements signed with the Palestinians, and when the situation was prepared with global unipolarity, the worsening Arab situation, the increase in settlement and demographic change on the land with the aim of increasing the number of settlers, this law was approved, which will end the right of Palestinian refugees to return to their homes and remove the city of Jerusalem from the equation and approve it as the capital of Israel At the expense of the Palestinian right, the study concluded that the entity’s leaders aim in the strategic dimension to expel the Palestinian people from their land, as well as reveal Israel’s ambitions for more settlement outside Palestine to achieve their dream of establishing their state from the Nile to the Euphrates.

And Israel’s lack of seriousness about the issue of negotiations, and that its actions on the ground indicated the difference between the theory of speech and painful action Reflecting on the ground, it was necessary to alert the Palestinian negotiator, and the law was denied to all non-Jews inside Israel despite the services they provide, and the danger of this law and any Palestinian or international interaction with it is to erase the history of the Palestinian people and their rights in their land, and accordingly the researcher recommended the need to work The Palestinian Authority has to return to demand the implementation of Partition Resolution No.

(181) to push Israel back, not to demand the 1967 borders.

And to work to give international law a role to be the ruling and not the negotiating table to prevent the Israeli entity from declaring a “Jewish state,” by exploiting the media.

Global local and social media to clarify the meaning and effects of the Jewishness of the state.