مدى مشروعية تدمير مصر لسد النهضة الأثيوبي في إطار القانون الدولي العام

Abstract EN

Through this thesis, it became clear to us that the right to selfdefense against aggression and self- determination, and against illegal interference, which is inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations, is not an absolute right, but rather restricted by several objective conditions, and other formal ones that are necessary in order for the aggressor state to practice this.

The right, and consequently the character of legality, applies to its behavior.

These conditions include what is related to the nature of aggression, including what is related to defense work, and what is related to the role of the Security Council and its oversight over legitimate defense actions taken by states, individually or groups, as we have already talked about in the first chapter of this The study, in addition to restricting several controls and restrictions that refine the behavior of the belligerents in the field, in a manner that puts the war in place if its just cause is found within the framework of legality.

These controls and restrictions are summed up in the harmonization between humanitarian considerations and military necessities.

Hostilities must not be directed at civilians of all sects, children, women, and the elderly.

The combatant is also prevented from not directing hostilities to their civilian objects or their religious sanctities, taking into account the other humanitarian aspects of Not to expel or transfer civilians, internally or externally, except for the necessity of protection.