العقلانية العلمية المعاصرة و انتقاداتها "كارل بوبر" و "بول فيرابند" نموذجا

Abstract EN

Any epistemological analytical study in the philosophy of science, whether in its history or in its scientific method, has played a great role, especially in shaping the features ofWestern thought.

Karl Popper and Paul Feyerabend constituted a focal point, especially in the issue of method.

Opinions differed and branched out, and the process of epistemological criticism became a serious and followed method, the results of which necessarily aim to respond to reality in the first place to bring about change.

On the other hand, and this is what Paul Feyerabend went to, where we will realize the difference between each trend, especially since the feature that distinguished contemporary scientific rationality is criticism and innovation, Contemporary epistemology came as a revolution against classical science, and its currents were characterized by a sharp critical tendency that shook the fields of knowledge and science.

Especially on the issue of the scientific method, the purpose of this study was to know the share of Karl Popper and Paul Feyerabend in this monetary process? What was the rationality of each of them?