أثر دلالة العام المطلق على الأحكام الشرعية: دراسة أصولية تطبيقية

Abstract EN

The research deals with one of the important topics that serve the science of jurisprudence, which is the sign of the absolute general in an applied fundamentalist vision, as the legal rulings are deduced by means of fundamentalist tools to reach them through the topics of semantics.

legitimacy, clarifying the issues of privatizing the absolute general, such as the issue of dissolving the sacrifice that has left the name, and the issue of the ownership of the quorum in the necessity of Zakat on crops and fruits, and the question of whether blood is permissible by resorting to the sanctuary, and drawing attention to the significance of the absolute general, its importance, and the need for Muslims to understand the purposes of its implications for rulings legitimacy.

in my study, I followed the following approaches: the inductive approach: by extrapolating the fundamentalist texts on the subject of the absolute general significance of the fundamentalist books and jurisprudential books in judging the effect of the absolute general indication on the legal rulings, and the descriptive approach: collecting the fundamental and jurisprudential legal texts with their related legal rulings that contained a connotation the absolute general and the comparative approach: comparing the opinions of the fundamentalists in the legal rulings related to the significance of the absolute general and the extent of its impact on it.

the study concluded with its most important results, which are: what is meant by the absolute general is “the one who was not accompanied by a presumption that negates the possibility of its specification, nor is a presumption that negates its significance in general, such as most of the texts that were received”, and the impact of the absolute general meaning on the legal rulings resulted in a fundamental disagreement among the jurists the four by allocating the year, definitive proof, with presumptive evidence such as the news of one and measurement, and the opinion of the public in allocating the year means limiting the year to some of its members with independent or non-independent evidence, comparative or non-comparative, and when the tap limits the year to some of its members with independent comparative evidence, if it was with lax evidence, it was copies.

and the definitive and reliable is the noble Qur’an and the Mutawatir Sunnah and it is attached to the Mutawatir according to the well-known Hanafis.