شبهات و ردود حول حديث الطاعون

Abstract EN

In this research, I explained the meanings of the hadith of the plague after its graduation, and collected the similarities around it, and they were nine as follows : the first : if Omar was satisfied with the predestination and believed in it, then what was the secret of his return from the saddle ? and the second : if Omar did what the Prophetic Sunnah recommended, why did he regret returning from his saddle ? and the third : if the disease does not infect itself, but rather by God almighty’s permission, why is it forbidden to enter and leave the affected land ? and the fourth : if the term is predetermined, why is it forbidden to enter or leave the affected land ? and the fifth : if it was forbidden to leave the affected country for fear of fleeing, why did some of the companions flee and not ? the sixth : how can the plague be a testimony and a punishment may be imposed because of sins ? and the seventh : if the prohibition was in place, why did Abu Musa send his daughter to the Bedouin ? and the eighth : how does he combine the hadith of the door and the hadith of Anas bin Malik : that Omar bin al-Khattab came to Syria, so Abu Talha and Abu Ubaidah bin al-Jarrah met him, so they said : commander of the faithful, you have the faces of the companions of the messenger of God and their choice, and we left us after us like the fire of fire so return the year, meaning : Omar returned, and when the next year came, he entered, meaning the plague.

this apparently contradicts the hadith of the chapter in In it is the certainty that Abu Ubaidah denied the return, and the ninth : is it permissible to drop the obligation of hajj when the plague spreads by analogy with the return of the commander of the faithful Omar from Sarg ? and I responded to it a scientific response according to the scientific rules in the field of hadith and its sciences.