طوماس هوبز : من أجل بناء الدولة الحديثة، و تجنب حرب الكل ضد الكل

Abstract EN

Through this research, we aim to make clear of a basic idea, which prevailed, and still prevailing, which is Thomas Hobbes has established political tyranny instead of religious tyranny, but the reality is vice versa.

Hobbes put the foundations of the modern state, based on law as the basis for state authority and delegated the ruler to ensure its implementation in order to guarantee peace and security, as well as to avoid a return to the civil and religious war because he experienced the hardness of war (the war of all against all).

What confirms our saying is that Hobbes legislated the right to the governed in order to resist the ruler if he threatens their fundamental rights such as the right to life and property..., but this resistance (peaceful rejection) does not aim to eliminate the country and return to a state of chaos, but rather to reforms its mistakes by reconsidering the contract through which the ruler was abdicated in order to be head of people's affairs, seeing that this authority granted to him is delegated by the people, not God.

Therefore, the people have the right to monitor, resist and correct any flaw that affects the social contract (the relationship of the ruler with the ruled).

We have covered this issue through four axes: 1.

What justifies the saying by the absolute authority? 2.

The absolute authority is not a tyranny.

3.

Voluntary obedience and refusing of tyranny 4.

The right in resistance and disobedience the absolute authority (authoritarianism)