الدور و أثره على صحة الاستدلال عند الأصوليين

Abstract EN

This research revolves around one of the most important objections that are frequently raised to inference in fundamentalist detectives, which is that the role is obligatory.

By this they mean that the two things stop at each other, so that the one thing is previous and not late, and no doubt that such a role, when proven, invalidates reasoning.

In the second, it mentioned a number of fundamental questions that were objected to in the role as a practical model from different doors.

In each issue, the words of the scholars in the dispute were mentioned, together with their sources of reference, which were documented, and then the statement of the role was signed.

The statement was followed by an analysis of the role in question and an assessment of the role was then made One of the most important findings of this research is that the role of the fundamentalists is to stop one from the other, and that there is a difference between the role and the sequence: that the role is to be in the infinite, while the sequence is to be in the infinite, and that there is a difference between the role and the stopping, where the role is to be between two parties, and when the reasoning is proved to be olute, while the stoppage in the evidence is to be one-sided, and for a period of time, and there is a difference between the role and the turn, where the role is to prove the fault while the role is to be used as a way to counteract the reasoning, and the role that the effect in the validity of the evidence is to be "presenting" and that the role is to be retained, and that the role is to play the true role of the debtors, The delusional role is the one that does not lead to the meeting of the two extremes, and can be pushed either by the breakup of the standpoint or as a permissible collective role, and this has no effect on inference.