القانون الكلي الكلامي : إشكالية الأصل و الفرع بين الأشاعرة و ابن تيمية

Abstract EN

The nature of the relationship between reason and revelation necessitated the formulation of a set of holistic rules that branched out from a group of issues and parts in various fields of knowledge in general and in the field of theology and jurisprudence in particular, in order to overcome the problems that arise in those fields of knowledge, and to preserve the pattern Which governs building Islamic sciences according to an integrative vision.

It is on this consideration that Islamic scholars formulated their total law that defines the relationship between reason and revelation, and it is a law that prevails between situations in which the contradiction between revelation and reason is fancied in different formulas: the formula of the philosophers which is based on the phenomena of texts directed to the public and the general public.

As for the version of the Theologians, there are two aspects: the principale in the first one is the mind and in the second is the revelation.