مقارنة استخدام طرق Ahp، Ahp-Topsis و Ahp-Vikor في اختيار موظف جديد : دراسة حالة ملبنة الحضنة

Abstract EN

Three multi-criteria decision-making methods were used to prioritize three alternatives according to the decision-maker's preference at M'sila Diary, It was found that the ranking results were different with the incompatibility of the two hybrid methods AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-VIKOR, and one of them and AHP-VIKOR outperformed the pure method, which is AHP.

Despite the treatment of the same problem and starting from the same decision matrix, MCDM methods deliver different results, an anomaly that is known as the 'decision-making paradox' and perhaps this explains this difference, compared to the decision-maker's ranking list based on his intuition And previous experience, the results were identical between the AHP-VIKOR methode and the decision-maker's order, which reflects the success of this method in reflecting the decision-maker's preferences.