النص و الخطاب : دراسة تحليلية

Abstract EN

The research shed light on points that clarified the differences between the discourse and the text on the difference in what the researchers mentioned in their theories or their search for those two terms in terms of the definition or the linguistic root of each word and what the recipient understands when he hears it.

And to clarify its function within a systematic study, and for the picture to be complete, scholars have made distinct efforts for many centuries for this end, and the linguistic schools are still continuing, and what was said in the linguistic lexicon about text and discourse is no more than a description, but the modern linguistic lesson adopted the logical approach and coupled the discourse with the concept of pattern and As for the text, it is a linguistic unit and its components depend on the sign Expression and identification is a communicative system, and there are different theories to differentiate between text, sentence and speech among Westerners.

The text has advantages that are available and known by it, such as harmony, acceptance, intentionality, and others, even if the problematic directions of the text with its components and its connection to literary production or writing and the distinction between text and discourse, one written and the other spoken, and the physical size of each From both of them, and the discourse is produced by the speaker, bypassing the dimensions of the sentence, and its function is to communicate or communicate between two parties, one trying to influence the other by multiple means.

The most important results are to prove that the science of the text has become familiar and circulated among researchers, and it contains treatments for semantics according to a new vision that helped in understanding the text