أثر استراتيجية مثلث لاستماع في تنمية التفكير الناقد لدى طالبات الصف الخامس الأدبي في مادة التاريخ

Abstract EN

The researcher followed the experimental approach to achieve the objectives of her current research and relied on the experimental design with partial control of the two equivalent experimental and control groups and the research community consisted of middle and secondary schools of the education of Karbala Governorate/ Center and the researcher chose the research sample from (w.

Al-Manar for girls) in a random manner.

The researcher has competed between the two research groups in some variables, including the ages of students calculated in months and intelligence test and parental achievement and critical thinking test and previous achievement in history and the researcher took the scale of critical thinking as a tool for research and has formulated a number of behavioral goals according to Bloom's classification of levels Bloom in the cognitive field of the six levels (knowledge - understanding - application analysis - installation - evaluation) and used appropriate statistical means to conduct research represented by the SPSS program and the researcher prepared study plans consisting of 16 lines.

The researcher adopted the scale (Kaabi, 2015), which consisted of (99) paragraphs distributed on five main tests (conclusion, knowledge of assumptions or postulates, deduction, interpretation, evaluation of arguments) after the researcher improved its paragraphs and developed to suit the content of the study material and after she made sure of its truthfulness, objectivity and stability, the researcher applied the end of the experiment to test the scale of critical thinking on the students of the experimental and control groups, which resulted in the following results : There is a statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the students of the experimental group that is taught according to the listening triangle strategy and the control group that studies the same history subject in the traditional way in critical thinking and for the benefit of the experimental group.